That's an interesting idea.
It does feel a bit different from what I imagined safe-rm to be (i.e. a tool that doesn't get in the way and only protects critical things) given that it actually makes the rm operation fail (or stop). So I guess it shouldn't be the default.
That's an interesting idea.
It does feel a bit different from what I imagined safe-rm to be (i.e. a tool that doesn't get in the way and only protects critical things) given that it actually makes the rm operation fail (or stop). So I guess it shouldn't be the default.