Comment 48 for bug 913230

(In reply to comment #46)
> (In reply to comment #45)
> > also, i don't think it's 100% safe and effort free at all. especially if you do
> > have enabled backports or 3rd party media.
> I don't think this is a good idea. You might enable backports repo but that
> doesn't mean you expect urpmi to pick extra packages from there during update.

and why not?

let's give an example:

let's say that in backports, there's an updated version of php.

it's not unfeasable that there's an update of phpmyadmin, which now suggests/requires php-ldap.

would you want that update to get the php-ldap version of updates? or the one from backports? considering all of your php is from backports?

you'd want the one from backports.

And this is exactly why it should be like this.

> And i also don't think that we should support 3rd party media.

of course