This is likely related to the architecture mapping located in the rpmns.c. We'll need to evaluate this for post 0.9. (I don't see this as a truly serious bug, more of an annoyance at this point.)
The normal way to work with RPM packages is to pass commands and ignore the version and arch components of the name.
This is likely related to the architecture mapping located in the rpmns.c. We'll need to evaluate this for post 0.9. (I don't see this as a truly serious bug, more of an annoyance at this point.)
The normal way to work with RPM packages is to pass commands and ignore the version and arch components of the name.