Comment 3 for bug 633665

(In reply to comment #1)
> Um, there's little reason to include static libraries in -debuginfo packages,
Wrong - You are missing source level debugging.

> as
> static libraries always contain the needed symbols to get a backtrace, and are
> (or at least were on ~RHL9 time frame) including debugging info in the *.a
> files.
ATM, you get source level debugging of shared libs but don't get it for static
libs - That's the first bug lurking in here.

The second one is rpmbuild building empty *-debuginfo-*.rpms, if a package
contains static libs only.

> WONTFIX
Great, how could I expect any other reaction, when it comes to rpm bugs :(