© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
eee2d0b
(Get the code!)
Taken from the original description of bug #496534, reported by Daniel Kulesz: https:/
Another concern: I think, most organizations might already have a review template, that is already in use since several years (if we assume they DO reviews actually). Therefore the least intrusive way to introduce RevAger into such an organization would be to re-use those templates.
To address these concerns, I propose to re-write some parts of the Protocol export functionality in order to make it template-based. I suggest we should use some format that allows for filling text marks - maybe RTF? Does it support that? (I am pretty sure at least OpenDocument does that, but RTF is more compatible)