The scenario measure the "nova host-describe <hostname>" command
performance, the code will describe all hosts which are listed by "nova
host-list" command performance. but the hostname seems to must be
compute host's name, so we only can describe compute hosts.
NOTE: change in atomics from original patch is missed here, since atomic refactoring patch was not included in 0.9.0 release
Change-Id: I037264580570e68b8cd587280f50660d89566051
Closes-Bug: #1675254
(cherry picked from commit 84229476d8d93ee6569aaf35427a605917d8836f)
Reviewed: https:/ /review. openstack. org/454810 /git.openstack. org/cgit/ openstack/ rally/commit/ ?id=71182b27516 d1241c84a871e78 42a7ca303421c8
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: stable/0.9
commit 71182b27516d124 1c84a871e7842a7 ca303421c8
Author: zhangzhang <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 7 10:35:58 2017 -0400
Fix list_and_get_host scenario bug
The scenario measure the "nova host-describe <hostname>" command
performance, the code will describe all hosts which are listed by "nova
host-list" command performance. but the hostname seems to must be
compute host's name, so we only can describe compute hosts.
NOTE: change in atomics from original patch is missed here, since atomic
refactoring patch was not included in 0.9.0 release
Change-Id: I037264580570e6 8b8cd587280f506 60d89566051 6569aaf35427a60 5917d8836f)
Closes-Bug: #1675254
(cherry picked from commit 84229476d8d93ee