Comment 5 for bug 309223
Revision history for this message
| Abdulaziz Ghuloum (aghuloum) wrote Re: [Bug 309223] Re: expansion of splicing let-syntax needs revision | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Dec 20, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Michael D. Adams wrote:
> Just to be clear, would the following still be legal?
>
> (let ()
> (let-syntax ([foo (identifier-syntax 12)])
> (define-syntax x (lambda (stx) #`(+ 3 #,foo))))
> x)
> => 15
Yes.
This is the same as:
(let ()
(let-syntax ([foo (identifier-syntax 12)])
(define-syntax x (lambda (stx) (list #'+ #'3 foo))))
x)
which is the same as:
(let ()
(define-syntax x (lambda (stx) (list #'+ #'3 #'12)))
x)
which is the same as:
(let ()
(+ 3 12))
Aziz,,,