On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 16:16 +0000, leppie wrote:
> Scary! I dont think I have ever come across it, but then again, I am
> not too comfortable with let-syntax and friends either still. :)
I used to think they are exotic and more complicated than they are.
They just bind identifiers to macro transformers, just like
define-syntax, but with the region of the bindings limited, and their
body is just like begin so it can have defines that get spliced. Take a
look at xitomatl/{alists,define,fuego}.sls for the simple way I've used
let-syntax so far.
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 16:16 +0000, leppie wrote:
> Scary! I dont think I have ever come across it, but then again, I am
> not too comfortable with let-syntax and friends either still. :)
I used to think they are exotic and more complicated than they are. {alists, define, fuego}. sls for the simple way I've used
They just bind identifiers to macro transformers, just like
define-syntax, but with the region of the bindings limited, and their
body is just like begin so it can have defines that get spliced. Take a
look at xitomatl/
let-syntax so far.