Comment 8 for bug 180455

> Come on. I didn't even use (... ...) or ((... ...) (... ...)) in that code!

I'll get there!

I am running into a another stumbling block now, not sure if this is related.

My buildscript is based on the psyntax one. Now when running it, I can see it is using the new definition, but during the expansion process I get this:

...
expanding psyntax/compat.ss
expanding psyntax/internal.ss
expanding psyntax/config.ss
expanding psyntax/library-manager.ss
&who: define-record
&message: raw symbol encountered in output of macro
&syntax: (define-record library (id name version imp* vis* inv* subst env visit-state invoke-state visible?)) id

Any suggestions?

Note: I am still using my 'ugly' macro as I dont have 'format' (yet).