Comment 11 for bug 1339308

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:42:26PM -0000, Adam Reichold wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Am 20.08.2014 um 11:02 schrieb Siep Kroonenberg:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:25:58PM -0000, Adam Reichold wrote:
> >> Hello again,
> >>
> >> Am 18.08.2014 um 21:37 schrieb Siep Kroonenberg:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:28:38PM -0000, Adam Reichold wrote:
> >>>> Hello again,
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 18.08.2014 um 11:56 schrieb Siep Kroonenberg:
> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 03:44:52PM -0000, Adam Reichold wrote:
> >>>>>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.dell.com/Manuals/all-
> > products/esuprt_desktop/esuprt_optiplex_desktop/optiplex-3010_Owner%27s
> > %20Manual3_en-us.pdf
>
> Can you be specific on the view and graphics settings which trigger the
> continuous rendering? (scale mode, tiling, obsolete pixmaps, etc.) I
> tried but could not reproduce it...

Continuous view. Screenshots of Behaviour-and Graphics settings
tabs:

Screenshot of graphics settings at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3b36vs2e01bz9me/qpdfview_settings.tgz

With the settings from the screenshot, page 14 gave trouble. I have
experimented with options 'Keep obsolete pixmaps', cache size and
widening and narrowing the document window. The upshot is simply
that different pages give trouble when I vary these.

> >> Unrelated question. The document seems strange insofar the cropping is
> >> minimal as the background seems to be only almost white instead of
> >> white. Is that correct and does stem from the usage of microtype?
> >
> > I think the `almost white' must be an optical illusion.
>
> It looks white, but the pixel values are not. That's what was irritating
> me, but it doesn't matter too much as long as the function does what it
> is supposed to.

If I take a screenshot with the Gimp from a blank area of the
document window and examine the pixel values, they are pure white.

--
Siep Kroonenberg