Comment 5 for bug 1880822

Revision history for this message
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (philmd) wrote : Re: [PATCH] hw/sd/sdcard: Verify CMD24 (Block Write) address is valid

On 6/4/20 8:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/06/20 19:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Avoid OOB access by verifying the requested address belong to
>> the actual card size. Return ADDRESS_ERROR when not in range.
>>
>> "SD Specifications Part 1 Physical Layer Simplified Spec. v3.01"
>>
>> 4.3.4 Data Write
>>
>> * Block Write
>>
>> Write command is rejected if BLOCK_LEN_ERROR or ADDRESS_ERROR
>> occurred and no data transfer is performed.
>>
>> Fixes: CVE-2020-13253
>> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <email address hidden>
>> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1880822
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <email address hidden>
>> ---
>> Cc: Prasad J Pandit <email address hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/sd/sd.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
>> index 3c06a0ac6d..0ced3b5e14 100644
>> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
>> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
>> @@ -1211,6 +1211,10 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_normal_command(SDState *sd, SDRequest req)
>> /* Writing in SPI mode not implemented. */
>> if (sd->spi)
>> break;
>> + if (addr >= sd->size) {
>> + sd->card_status |= ADDRESS_ERROR;
>> + return sd_r1;
>> + }
>> sd->state = sd_receivingdata_state;
>> sd->data_start = addr;
>> sd->data_offset = 0;
>>
>
> I'm not sure if you want me to queue it, but I did.

Hmm I guess I typed "^RPrasad" in my shell to have the last git-publish
command with his email, and I didn't noticed you were also there...

Anyway looking at it again, this patch is wrong because I should check
for addr + blksize < sd_size instead. Can you drop it please?

> Probably we should
> add <email address hidden> to the hw/sd stanza.

OK will do.

>
> Paolo
>