I would observe that it would be much better if the order of the -serial arguments did not matter so much. I know gcc has the same sort of madness (for instance), but it sure isn't intuitive.
But in my case, when you do the -serial things out of order, you end up with a segfault.
That can't be the intended behavior.
I would observe that it would be much better if the order of the -serial arguments did not matter so much. I know gcc has the same sort of madness (for instance), but it sure isn't intuitive.
But in my case, when you do the -serial things out of order, you end up with a segfault.
That can't be the intended behavior.