Comment 3 for bug 1836558

By running:

  valgrind --leak-check=yes ./qemu-ppc tests/testthread

I can replicate a leak compared to qemu-arm with the same test....

==25789== at 0x483577F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) [13/7729]
==25789== by 0x4D7F8D0: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.5800.3)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: create_new_table (translate_init.inc.c:9252)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: register_ind_in_table (translate_init.inc.c:9291)
==25789== by 0x1FC971: register_ind_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9325)
==25789== by 0x1FC971: register_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9390)
==25789== by 0x1FC971: create_ppc_opcodes (translate_init.inc.c:9450)
==25789== by 0x1FC971: ppc_cpu_realize (translate_init.inc.c:9819)
==25789== by 0x277263: device_set_realized (qdev.c:834)
==25789== by 0x27BBC6: property_set_bool (object.c:2076)
==25789== by 0x28019E: object_property_set_qobject (qom-qobject.c:26)
==25789== by 0x27DAF4: object_property_set_bool (object.c:1334)
==25789== by 0x27AE4B: cpu_create (cpu.c:62)
==25789== by 0x1C89B8: cpu_copy (main.c:188)
==25789== by 0x1CA44F: do_fork (syscall.c:5604)
==25789== by 0x1D665A: do_syscall1.isra.43 (syscall.c:9160)
==25789==
==25789== 6,656 bytes in 26 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 216 of 238
==25789== at 0x483577F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==25789== by 0x4D7F8D0: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.5800.3)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: create_new_table (translate_init.inc.c:9252)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: register_ind_in_table (translate_init.inc.c:9291)
==25789== by 0x1FC9BA: register_dblind_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9337)
==25789== by 0x1FC9BA: register_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9384)
==25789== by 0x1FC9BA: create_ppc_opcodes (translate_init.inc.c:9450)
==25789== by 0x1FC9BA: ppc_cpu_realize (translate_init.inc.c:9819)
==25789== by 0x277263: device_set_realized (qdev.c:834)
==25789== by 0x27BBC6: property_set_bool (object.c:2076)
==25789== by 0x28019E: object_property_set_qobject (qom-qobject.c:26)
==25789== by 0x27DAF4: object_property_set_bool (object.c:1334)
==25789== by 0x27AE4B: cpu_create (cpu.c:62)
==25789== by 0x17304D: main (main.c:681)
==25789==
==25789== 10,752 (1,024 direct, 9,728 indirect) bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 223 of 238
==25789== at 0x483577F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==25789== by 0x4D7F8D0: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.5800.3)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: create_new_table (translate_init.inc.c:9252)
==25789== by 0x1FC65D: register_ind_in_table (translate_init.inc.c:9291)
==25789== by 0x1FC998: register_dblind_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9332)
==25789== by 0x1FC998: register_insn (translate_init.inc.c:9384)
==25789== by 0x1FC998: create_ppc_opcodes (translate_init.inc.c:9450)
==25789== by 0x1FC998: ppc_cpu_realize (translate_init.inc.c:9819)
==25789== by 0x277263: device_set_realized (qdev.c:834)
==25789== by 0x27BBC6: property_set_bool (object.c:2076)
==25789== by 0x28019E: object_property_set_qobject (qom-qobject.c:26)
==25789== by 0x27DAF4: object_property_set_bool (object.c:1334)
==25789== by 0x27AE4B: cpu_create (cpu.c:62)
==25789== by 0x1C89B8: cpu_copy (main.c:188)
==25789== by 0x1CA44F: do_fork (syscall.c:5604)
==25789== by 0x1D665A: do_syscall1.isra.43 (syscall.c:9160)

So something funky happens to the PPC translator for each new thread....