Comment 1 for bug 321389

Since the graph most of the time reflects the chronology of the merges and,
when no merges exist in a branch, the simplified graph *is* in reverse chronological order
(so the more recent revisions are shown first),I don't understand what you're talking about.

Can you explain with more details or even show us a public branch where the current approach
is not presenting the graph in a reverse chronological order ?