Comment 2 for bug 1829249

Revision history for this message
Herald ten Dam (damsteen) wrote :

Hi,

I did some tracing and it is correct it is the socket receiving:
     0.000090 socket(PF_IUCV, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
     0.000061 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0<\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
     0.000045 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_IUCV, sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0 "}, 32) = 0
     0.000707 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\360\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
     0.000049 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
     0.000047 send(3, "\0\0\0%\0\0\0\16Image_Query_DM\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 41, 0) = 41
     0.000060 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\360\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
     0.000052 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
     0.000048 recv(3, "\4\335\232:", 4, 0) = 4
     0.042885 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\360\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
     0.000067 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
     0.000066 recv(3, "\0\0\4T", 4, 0) = 4
     2.009859 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\360\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 0
     0.000083 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
     0.000047 recv(3, "\4\335\232:\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4D\0\0\0PUSER SLD510T"..., 1108, 0) = 1108
     0.000066 shutdown(3, SHUT_RDWR) = 0
     0.000078 close(3) = 0

Because we have already a difference of 2 seconds to 1 seconds, is there something I can look in our setup were the delay is?

Herald