signalfd.signalfd() ignores fd parameter

Bug #1300342 reported by Jon
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
python-signalfd
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Looking at the code for signalfd.signalfd(), it looks like it accepts a "fd" parameter but doesn't use it, it always passes -1 to the underlying syscall.

It should pass the "fd" parameter to the underlying syscall.

Jon (jon-work)
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.