Activity log for bug #1300342

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2014-03-31 17:07:32 Jon bug added bug
2014-03-31 17:08:15 Jon description Looking at the code for signalfd.signalfd(), it looks like it accepts a "fd" parameter but doesn't use it, it always passes -1 to the underlying syscall. Looking at the code for signalfd.signalfd(), it looks like it accepts a "fd" parameter but doesn't use it, it always passes -1 to the underlying syscall. It should pass the "fd" parameter to the underlying syscall.