signalfd.signalfd() ignores fd parameter

Bug #1300342 reported by Jon on 2014-03-31
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone

Bug Description

Looking at the code for signalfd.signalfd(), it looks like it accepts a "fd" parameter but doesn't use it, it always passes -1 to the underlying syscall.

It should pass the "fd" parameter to the underlying syscall.

Jon (jon-work) on 2014-03-31
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers