We have a volunteer (John Davidge). It might be that neutron is the first to add a "purge_resources_owned_by(tenant_id)" API, but that shouldn't stop us. We should definitely get cross-project agreement on how such an API should look/behave so that other projects can align when they get around to their implementations. I am willing to be the approver for this effort if we can agree to go for it. I got the sense that operators will love the feature.
We have a volunteer (John Davidge). It might be that neutron is the first to add a "purge_ resources_ owned_by( tenant_ id)" API, but that shouldn't stop us. We should definitely get cross-project agreement on how such an API should look/behave so that other projects can align when they get around to their implementations. I am willing to be the approver for this effort if we can agree to go for it. I got the sense that operators will love the feature.