I think that makes sense in general. For our needs specifically, I
think we’ll be using all (or nearly all) strings. However, assuming
“value” is a kwarg in pymqi, I would assume the default value should
be None and the default type should be MQTYPE_NULL.
Phil
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Dariusz Suchojad
<email address hidden> wrote:
> So I'm implementing MQSETMP right now and wonder what the default data
> type should be. I guess string will do, no? Most of the message
> properties will be strings not some fancy MQTYPE_FLOAT32 and that's what
> we should default to? What to do you think?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755004
>
> Title:
> Setting message properties
>
> Status in Python interface to WebSphere MQ:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> It has been reported in a private e-mail that PyMQI (as of version
> 1.2) is missing pretty much everything that's need for setting of and
> querying by custom MQ 7.0-style message properties. These IBM
> presentations give a good overview of what can be implemented
> http://j.mp/hmoD2Vhttp://j.mp/gQ2jHk This includes supporting new MQ
> verbs, such as MQCMHO, MQCRTMH, MQINQMP etc.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/pymqi/+bug/755004/+subscribe
>
I think that makes sense in general. For our needs specifically, I
think we’ll be using all (or nearly all) strings. However, assuming
“value” is a kwarg in pymqi, I would assume the default value should
be None and the default type should be MQTYPE_NULL.
Phil
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Dariusz Suchojad /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 755004 j.mp/hmoD2V http:// j.mp/gQ2jHk This includes supporting new MQ /bugs.launchpad .net/pymqi/ +bug/755004/ +subscribe
<email address hidden> wrote:
> So I'm implementing MQSETMP right now and wonder what the default data
> type should be. I guess string will do, no? Most of the message
> properties will be strings not some fancy MQTYPE_FLOAT32 and that's what
> we should default to? What to do you think?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Setting message properties
>
> Status in Python interface to WebSphere MQ:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> It has been reported in a private e-mail that PyMQI (as of version
> 1.2) is missing pretty much everything that's need for setting of and
> querying by custom MQ 7.0-style message properties. These IBM
> presentations give a good overview of what can be implemented
> http://
> verbs, such as MQCMHO, MQCRTMH, MQINQMP etc.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https:/
>