Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 14:33 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Is there any reason for using the auto* tools rather than distutils ?
> Hysterical raisons.
Hmm.. so patches to change that situation would be welcome ?
Cheers,
Jelmer
P.S. Did you see my followup to your review of my other pqm-bzr patch?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 14:33 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Is there any reason for using the auto* tools rather than distutils ?
> Hysterical raisons.
Hmm.. so patches to change that situation would be welcome ?
Cheers,
Jelmer
P.S. Did you see my followup to your review of my other pqm-bzr patch?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
0JeEGD2blAQLBow P9E0foXdq34rbpP jrtCIZ5YM91X9pM k0u5 r4DYhlff0BroLCy NYnD58Fo8/ Xdc4gSsjoZCP7k+ BSbE7IdgN PwkIRSySQNEMyr/ jBG8XDOEAoCuRAz sPQ0jVZxEb9MsxZ B73V
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iQCVAwUBRl6Wfgy
Gy7lyLZWBnc1A7B
q71fH9tutknWrXm
SsRn3GCoAt0=
=plVu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----