if we can separate the copyrighted stuff from the raw data, we
might just get around this.
Can anyone explain which part of the poppler-data are patented?
madbiologist wrote:
> Unfortunately poppler-data is in multiverse since it includes
> copyrighted (and patent pending) technologies by Adobe.
>
> However, this seems like good news in the right direction from Adobe:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/
>
>
if we can separate the copyrighted stuff from the raw data, we
might just get around this.
Can anyone explain which part of the poppler-data are patented?
madbiologist wrote: lwn.net/ Articles/ 354360/
> Unfortunately poppler-data is in multiverse since it includes
> copyrighted (and patent pending) technologies by Adobe.
>
> However, this seems like good news in the right direction from Adobe:
> http://
>
>