Hi,
Is there any reason to change the Mail.buildMessage method's signature (replyTo argument type) ?
r781 : public static MimeMessage buildMessage(InternetAddress from, Object replyTo, Object[] recipients, String subject, String body, String alternate, String contentType, String charset, Map<String, String> headers, Object... attachments)
r782: public static MimeMessage buildMessage(InternetAddress from, InternetAddress replyTo, Object[] recipients, String subject, String body, String alternate, String contentType, String charset, Map<String, String> headers, Object... attachments)
Object type had been chosen to allow to call buildMessage() with a replyTo as a String or as an InternetAdress object.
It breaks some applications that are already in production...
Hi,
Is there any reason to change the Mail.buildMessage method's signature (replyTo argument type) ?
r781 : public static MimeMessage buildMessage( InternetAddress from, Object replyTo, Object[] recipients, String subject, String body, String alternate, String contentType, String charset, Map<String, String> headers, Object... attachments)
r782: public static MimeMessage buildMessage( InternetAddress from, InternetAddress replyTo, Object[] recipients, String subject, String body, String alternate, String contentType, String charset, Map<String, String> headers, Object... attachments)
Object type had been chosen to allow to call buildMessage() with a replyTo as a String or as an InternetAdress object.
It breaks some applications that are already in production...