That would be pretty cool, honestly, Colin, I didn't even think you'd see this. I mistyped the heading apparently, because I was actually referring to the disk_stress_ng wrapper script.
But now that you bring it up, an exit code other than 1 would be awesome and much easier to trap (and certainly less functional overhead on the user end than wrappers that make decisions based on discovered architecture)
That would be pretty cool, honestly, Colin, I didn't even think you'd see this. I mistyped the heading apparently, because I was actually referring to the disk_stress_ng wrapper script.
But now that you bring it up, an exit code other than 1 would be awesome and much easier to trap (and certainly less functional overhead on the user end than wrappers that make decisions based on discovered architecture)