At least, checkbox is unable to find the product name in the pci.ids document (/usr/share/misc/pci.ids).
On my 14.04 system, the vendor/product ID does have an entry, so maybe your system is using 12.04 and it doesn't have this entry.
In any case, without updating the pci.ids file (see update-pciids command) there's no way for the parser to identify the product name :(
I have two questions:
1- Even if the test name is incorrect, does it work properly during testing?
2- If you update the PCI IDs and then rerun checkbox, does the test name appear correctly now?
We can try updating the PCI IDs in our preseed, or if this is a mostly cosmetic problem, we can just ignore it. A third option would be for the graphics_card_resource to insert a "no_product_name" element as the product attribute, but I think this would be more confusing.
OK, the GPU/APU has NO product name:
path: /devices/ pci0000: 00/0000: 00:01.0
bus: pci
category: VIDEO
driver: fglrx_pci
product_id: 38995
vendor_id: 4098
subproduct_id: 1623
subvendor_id: 4136
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
At least, checkbox is unable to find the product name in the pci.ids document (/usr/share/ misc/pci. ids).
On my 14.04 system, the vendor/product ID does have an entry, so maybe your system is using 12.04 and it doesn't have this entry.
In any case, without updating the pci.ids file (see update-pciids command) there's no way for the parser to identify the product name :(
I have two questions:
1- Even if the test name is incorrect, does it work properly during testing?
2- If you update the PCI IDs and then rerun checkbox, does the test name appear correctly now?
We can try updating the PCI IDs in our preseed, or if this is a mostly cosmetic problem, we can just ignore it. A third option would be for the graphics_ card_resource to insert a "no_product_name" element as the product attribute, but I think this would be more confusing.