Comment 5 for bug 386741
Revision history for this message
| robinmills (robinmills) wrote Re: [Phatch-dev] [Bug 386741] Re: Implementation of "Time shift action" | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Goodness, Stani. Isn't it time for bed?
Good weekend in Belgium? (answer tomorrow). Bed. Now!
Robin
http://
On Jun 14, 2009, at 10:13 PM, stani wrote:
> ** Description changed:
>
> This patch implements https:/
> /time-shift-action .
>
> - Note that this action as well as other actions related to metadata
> seem
> - to modify original input images in any case (ie. even if save
> action is
> - provided). I'm not convinced this is a good default behavior as it's
> - easy to mess up metadata of your original files easily this way.
> (Result
> - does not match expectation as Phatch works in non-destructive way
> with
> - images. :) )
> + Juho: Note that this action as well as other actions related to
> metadata
> + seem to modify original input images in any case (ie. even if save
> + action is provided). I'm not convinced this is a good default
> behavior
> + as it's easy to mess up metadata of your original files easily
> this way.
> + (Result does not match expectation as Phatch works in non-
> destructive
> + way with images. :) )
> +
> + Stani: At the moment the design is that the metadata actions should
> + modify the source image is the metadata action is placed *before*
> the
> + save action. So this is totally intended at the moment. When it is
> + placed *after* the save action, it will modify only the saved
> file. See
> + the phatch-dev mailing list. This behavior will change soon to a
> better
> + approach.
>
> --
> Implementation of "Time shift action"
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Phatch
> Developers, which is subscribed to Phatch.
>
> Status in Phatch = Photo & Batch!: New
>
> Bug description:
> This patch implements https:/
> .
>
> Juho: Note that this action as well as other actions related to
> metadata seem to modify original input images in any case (ie. even
> if save action is provided). I'm not convinced this is a good
> default behavior as it's easy to mess up metadata of your original
> files easily this way. (Result does not match expectation as Phatch
> works in non-destructive way with images. :) )
>
> Stani: At the moment the design is that the metadata actions should
> modify the source image is the metadata action is placed *before*
> the save action. So this is totally intended at the moment. When it
> is placed *after* the save action, it will modify only the saved
> file. See the phatch-dev mailing list. This behavior will change
> soon to a better approach.
>
> _______
> Mailing list: https:/
> Post to : <email address hidden>
> Unsubscribe : https:/
> More help : https:/