Comment 8 for bug 1243156

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Gribov (grib-d) wrote :

Nope. We have tested with this:
Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.5.39-25.11 + Galera 2.11.2675

Variable_name Value
wsrep_local_state_uuid 2db76c9f-1717-11e3-b9d2-2f0c3a53a9e5
wsrep_protocol_version 4
wsrep_last_committed 12010943836
wsrep_replicated 49401
wsrep_replicated_bytes 1095127796
wsrep_received 1250506
wsrep_received_bytes 8274408205
wsrep_local_commits 48527
wsrep_local_cert_failures 869
wsrep_local_replays 0
wsrep_local_send_queue 0
wsrep_local_send_queue_avg 0
wsrep_local_recv_queue 0
wsrep_local_recv_queue_avg 0.318141
wsrep_flow_control_paused 0
wsrep_flow_control_sent 0
wsrep_flow_control_recv 0
wsrep_cert_deps_distance 57.492063
wsrep_apply_oooe 0.218834
wsrep_apply_oool 0
wsrep_apply_window 3.387444
wsrep_commit_oooe 0
wsrep_commit_oool 0
wsrep_commit_window 2.859617
wsrep_local_state 4
wsrep_local_state_comment Synced
wsrep_cert_index_size 66
wsrep_causal_reads 0
wsrep_incoming_addresses 192.168.0.212:8661,192.168.1.72:8661,192.168.0.214:8661,192.168.1.69:8661
wsrep_cluster_conf_id 30
wsrep_cluster_size 4
wsrep_cluster_state_uuid 2db76c9f-1717-11e3-b9d2-2f0c3a53a9e5
wsrep_cluster_status Primary
wsrep_connected ON
wsrep_local_bf_aborts 138
wsrep_local_index 0
wsrep_provider_name Galera
wsrep_provider_vendor Codership Oy <email address hidden>
wsrep_provider_version 2.11(r318911d)
wsrep_ready ON
wsrep_thread_count 49

it still hangs with "WSREP: BF lock wait long" (see attachment)