Comment 6 for bug 1078759

Revision history for this message
Alex Yurchenko (ayurchen) wrote :

This is a work in progress. With the same test current 3.x tree shows:
3.1 wsrep OFF
Rows Seconds RSS
1 0 82116
2 0 82116
4 0 82116
8 0 82116
16 0 82116
32 0 82116
64 0 82116
128 0 82376
256 0 82376
512 0 82640
1024 0 83232
2048 0 83860
4096 0 85116
8192 0 87600
16384 0 92616
32768 1 102664
65536 0 122724
131072 2 163204
262144 2 243008
524288 5 342216
1048576 11 342216

3.1 wsrep ON
Rows Seconds RSS
1 0 82428
2 0 82428
4 0 82428
8 0 82596
16 0 82624
32 0 82704
64 0 82704
128 0 82704
256 0 82964
512 0 83228
1024 0 83856
2048 0 84604
4096 0 86912
8192 0 91548
16384 0 100100
32768 1 117856
65536 1 140960
131072 2 199612
262144 4 317012
524288 9 484000
1048576 18 617764

This effectively halves memory overhead compared to 2.x branch.