Comment 30 for bug 1472779

Revision history for this message
Dave Gregg (dgregg) wrote :

Morning Frank,

OK - we will give this a try. I will let you know later today. This is getting more and more urgent to get a solution as we have a production topology that operates 24x7 that needs to be updated soon.

The background on these servers I am testing. They are VMWare VMs. They were initially created with 50GB hard drives.
I expanded the drives to be 200GB drives for these servers in this particular topology.

I have not done any disk Drive Validation.....I can do so and see if anything shows up.

So that is the history on these particular systems. They appear OK - but who knows?

So you are thinking that this Scenario Should Work ? A combination "MASTER/Slave" Server (it is BOTH) is being
updated and it replicates to a Salve underneath or subordinate to it......and it is ALSO is a slave to another Master above it....?
Should not be an issue??

~ Dave