Comment 6 for bug 1097260

Revision history for this message
Stewart Smith (stewart) wrote : Re: [Bug 1097260] Re: [DOC] Dump/Restore of the Buffer Pool makes little sense with flash

Aurimas Mikalauskas <email address hidden> writes:
> Tanks for feedback everyone, I'm glad we discussed this here. I fully
> agree that warm up in general is a good idea even with flash, though I
> didn't realize that there's any difference between random and sequential
> IO on flash. Avoiding unusually long time to run queries sounds like a
> good case to me, so I guess we can scratch that.

I'll turn this into a documentation request, and it'd be great if
somebody did some benchmarks to go with it (and blog post :)
--
Stewart Smith