Comment 2 for bug 1097260

Revision history for this message
Stewart Smith (stewart) wrote : Re: [Bug 1097260] Re: [DOC] Dump/Restore of the Buffer Pool makes little sense with flash

Alexey Kopytov <email address hidden> writes:
> I don't understand the question. What's wrong with a non-blocking buffer
> pool restore on flash? Yes, LRU dump files are sorted for sequential
> reads on restore, which doesn't make much sense for flash storage, but
> it doesn't hurt either?

It probably does make some sense though, as random IO is still slower
than sequential, it's just not as many orders of magnitude slower (and
everything is much faster anyway).

--
Stewart Smith