Alexey Kopytov <email address hidden> writes:
> I don't understand the question. What's wrong with a non-blocking buffer
> pool restore on flash? Yes, LRU dump files are sorted for sequential
> reads on restore, which doesn't make much sense for flash storage, but
> it doesn't hurt either?
It probably does make some sense though, as random IO is still slower
than sequential, it's just not as many orders of magnitude slower (and
everything is much faster anyway).
Alexey Kopytov <email address hidden> writes:
> I don't understand the question. What's wrong with a non-blocking buffer
> pool restore on flash? Yes, LRU dump files are sorted for sequential
> reads on restore, which doesn't make much sense for flash storage, but
> it doesn't hurt either?
It probably does make some sense though, as random IO is still slower
than sequential, it's just not as many orders of magnitude slower (and
everything is much faster anyway).
--
Stewart Smith