Basically, you should explain reasons.
I don't accept wrong constitute names and cheating user names.
> INNODB_AUTO_LRU_DUMP
> to
> innodb_enable_fast_warmup
fast? warmup?
I don't like to cheat users. It is really not concrete name.
The name should express the effect cleanly.
> INNODB_EXPAND_IMPORT
> to
> innodb_enable_import_tables
"IMPORT TABLE" is supported basically. It is wrong name.
> INNODB_OVERWRITE_RELAY_LOG_INFO
> to
> innodb_provide_replication_position
I don't like to cheat users. It is really not concrete name.
The name should express the effect cleanly.
> INNODB_PASS_CORRUPT_TABLE
> Rename to innodb_stop_on_corrupt_table=0|1 ( default is 1)
The user should understand passing corrupt table is abnormal for RDBMS...
It may not the problem only about the table.
,as I described before.
InnoDB should abort for all corruption detections.
You should explain the abnormal name for me, again.
You didn't explain any at the previous report.
I don't accept one-side intrusion...
> And next status variables:
>> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_AGE
>> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_MAX_AGE
>> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_TARGET_AGE
>
> Should be
> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_AGE
> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_AGE_MAX
> INNODB_CHECKPOINT_AGE_TARGET
I intended that
values about checkpoint
"age", "max age" and "target age".
Basically, you should explain reasons.
I don't accept wrong constitute names and cheating user names.
> INNODB_ AUTO_LRU_ DUMP enable_ fast_warmup
> to
> innodb_
fast? warmup?
I don't like to cheat users. It is really not concrete name.
The name should express the effect cleanly.
> INNODB_ EXPAND_ IMPORT enable_ import_ tables
> to
> innodb_
"IMPORT TABLE" is supported basically. It is wrong name.
> INNODB_ OVERWRITE_ RELAY_LOG_ INFO provide_ replication_ position
> to
> innodb_
I don't like to cheat users. It is really not concrete name.
The name should express the effect cleanly.
> INNODB_ PASS_CORRUPT_ TABLE stop_on_ corrupt_ table=0| 1 ( default is 1)
> Rename to innodb_
The user should understand passing corrupt table is abnormal for RDBMS...
It may not the problem only about the table.
,as I described before.
InnoDB should abort for all corruption detections.
You should explain the abnormal name for me, again.
You didn't explain any at the previous report.
I don't accept one-side intrusion...
> And next status variables: CHECKPOINT_ AGE CHECKPOINT_ MAX_AGE CHECKPOINT_ TARGET_ AGE CHECKPOINT_ AGE CHECKPOINT_ AGE_MAX CHECKPOINT_ AGE_TARGET
>> INNODB_
>> INNODB_
>> INNODB_
>
> Should be
> INNODB_
> INNODB_
> INNODB_
I intended that
values about checkpoint
"age", "max age" and "target age".