Code review tells that the number of buffer pool instances should be completely orthogonal to the number of AHI partitions. Were there any bugs that were repeatable with ibpi > 1 and not repeatable with ibpi = 1 while the number of AHI partitions was kept constant at > 1?
Re. RQG, see PQA-58 for AHI partitions and I'm asking Roel the status of ibpi > 1 testing there.
Raghu -
Code review tells that the number of buffer pool instances should be completely orthogonal to the number of AHI partitions. Were there any bugs that were repeatable with ibpi > 1 and not repeatable with ibpi = 1 while the number of AHI partitions was kept constant at > 1?
Re. RQG, see PQA-58 for AHI partitions and I'm asking Roel the status of ibpi > 1 testing there.