Comment 4 for bug 256241
Revision history for this message
| rejon (rejon) wrote Re: [Bug 256241] Re: "lock" certain book metadate fields by removing ability to edit | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
This is good to know. For our review vices, I think hiding the fields is
good enough. And, now that greg has filed for this feature, and our
plans post AC review, I think we are set.
Cool
Jon
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 18:59 +0000, solrize wrote:
> Note that messing with the template doesn't really prevent the user from
> changing those fields. It just makes it less convenient. If you really
> want to lock the fields securely, you might open an Infogami feature
> request. There has been an interest in something like that on Wikipedia
> for a long time. But they have a lot more edit wars and persistent
> vandalism than we do (at least for now...).
>
--
Jon Phillips
San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing
GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884
CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624
<email address hidden>
http://
IM/skype: kidproto
Jabber: <email address hidden>
IRC: <email address hidden>