Comment 30 for bug 183052

Revision history for this message
Marcus Bornfreund (marcus-lawshare) wrote :

From: Savitha Thampi <email address hidden>
Date: December 12, 2008 17:24:52 EST (CA)
To: 'Marcus Bornfreund' <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Crown Copyright

Hi Marcus,

Thanks for putting up a posting on the Crown Copyright issue to the bug website. I actually want to propose another way to do it:
How about:

“Crown Copyright?”
 If “Yes” then [i.e. at least 1 author = “Queen’s Printer”, etc.]
   “Any Co-Authors?”
    If “Yes” then go to “Pseudonomysly or Anonymously Published?” (and continue as if not a Crown Copyright publication)

 If “No” then
  “Published?” (and it will continue as Crown Copyright is currently set up in the flow chart)
     If “No” then go to “Pseudonymously or Anonymously Published”

Basically, I don't think we should create a new category - if there is a co-author that isn't "Queen's Printer", then it should go back to the default flow chart (as if its not a Crown Publication at all), because the other assessments still need to be worked through.

Do you have any objections to the above flow-through?

Thanks,
Savitha

Savitha Thampi
Associate Legal Counsel
Access Copyright
The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency
One Yonge Street, Suite 800
Toronto, ON M5E 1E5

Phone: (416) 868-1620 X 254
Toll Free: 1-800-893-5777 X 254
Fax: (416) 868-1621
<email address hidden>

This message, including any attachments, is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or have otherwise received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and be advised that the use, disclosure or copying of any portion of this message is unauthorized and may be unlawful. Please permanently delete the original message, including any attachments, without making a copy.