> I am a little unconvinced it calls startupdates at all, because then
> repeated calls would presumably eventually work and they don't?
startUpdates() is being called, but because oxide gets a position right away (the last known one), it calls stopUpdates(), which prevents the GPS from actually being woken up at all.
> I am a little unconvinced it calls startupdates at all, because then
> repeated calls would presumably eventually work and they don't?
startUpdates() is being called, but because oxide gets a position right away (the last known one), it calls stopUpdates(), which prevents the GPS from actually being woken up at all.