Comment 8 for bug 2017886

Even with redistribute kernel, its not being announced. Either way, with SNAT turned off, we're still adding a route for that network (192.168.0.0/24) via nexthop the logical router port.

I believe we need to expose the port/IP connecting the tenant subnet to the logical router in a disabled SNAT configuration. Also, I am wondering if having SNAT in an expose tenant network configuration is a good idea, because leveraging the NAT kind of defeats the purpose of having it.