Comment 136 for bug 1823200
Revision history for this message
| Brian Rosmaita (brian-rosmaita) wrote | #136 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
I want to add an addendum to comment #55. That roll-out plan worked fine, except that we should have used the same Change-Id on all the cinder patches, and same Change-Id on all the os-brick patches. This would have made it easier for people looking to see which branches contained the fix, because they would have been connected in the way backports usually are.