This looks very good. I do, however, have one correction I would like to submit. In v2.0 of the images api, we simply did not include image sharing--so the vulnerability does not exist there. It is only part of the v1 series.
This looks very good. I do, however, have one correction I would like to submit. In v2.0 of the images api, we simply did not include image sharing--so the vulnerability does not exist there. It is only part of the v1 series.