So https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165908/ exists, but it will likely cover up proper failures too, any other ideas? Should we be trying to fix the issue, or just document that this is going to be a limitation?
Brant: Isn't it safer to write your rules correctly to begin with rather than ignoring errors?
So https:/ /review. openstack. org/#/c/ 165908/ exists, but it will likely cover up proper failures too, any other ideas? Should we be trying to fix the issue, or just document that this is going to be a limitation?
Brant: Isn't it safer to write your rules correctly to begin with rather than ignoring errors?