Comment 202 for bug 2004555

I was contacted privately by an operator who read the advisory and was unable to reproduce the failure in their iSCSI based deployment. They suspect that the fact they're not relying on multipathd is protecting them from the vulnerability. Is anyone able to confirm whether this affects iSCSI environments without multipathd? If it doesn't, I'll look into issuing an errata update clarifying the scope of the vulnerability further.