Comment 3 for bug 364267

I also share Jan's view. We should include all classes regardless of
whether they are documented or not.
I also like it to have browsable source code of each class to view it
online. Often the best documentation
is the source code itself ;). And in our case the source code ist mostly
the only documentation that is available ;)

Jan schrieb:
> OK, I see that the alphabetical list of all classes shows much more.
> However, if I build the documentation from a vanilla openwns-sdk with
> doxygen 1.5.3, I see all the available namespaces on that page and I
> prefer it this way.
>
> The situation is the same for the list of all classes, only documented
> classes are shown. Imagine a user is looking for information about the
> beamforming antenna. He will only find
> wns::service::phy::ofdma::BeamForming because this is listed due to its
> short annotation. What he will not find - and maybe that's what he was
> really looking for - is rise::antenna::Beamforming. Note that the page
> exists on docs.openwns.org
> (http://docs.openwns.org/api/classrise_1_1antenna_1_1Beamforming.htm)
> but simply isn't linked.
>
> In my opinion it is confusing to hide classes that actually exist just
> because they do not have this short text description. But that's just my
> 2cents.
>
>