Comment 50 for bug 1191447

If you have an idea for the template design then please log a new bug with
a description of the issue. The template design was tested and vetted after
November 2014, so I sense there's a disconnect in tracking that may be
better solved with a new issue describing the problem better. This one is
stale, has too many comments, and has become conflated with redirect issues
and version surfacing rather than the issue you just listed.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Tom Fifield <email address hidden>
wrote:

> Hi yup,
>
> So, the watermark was a stop-gap we could do quickly - never intended as
> full solution to the problem. If the RST conversion was the eventual
> solution, this bug should remain open until it is completed.
>
> However, unfortunately, the RST template doesn't actually do anything to
> mark outdated doc pages :)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1228721).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191447
>
> Title:
> Collection of design and experience issues with docs.openstack.org
>
> Status in OpenStack Manuals:
> Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> We still get disqus comments on very old doc pages (e.g., I replied to
> one today that was on a diablo(!) page).
>
> If we are going to keep these around, it would be helpful if they were
> clearly labelled as being out of date.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1191447/+subscriptions
>