At the moment we do install EPEL repo in multiple other roles, like
lxc_hosts or systemd_mount. We're trying to be consistent in ways
of adding them, while ceph_client was slightly different, by carrying on
GPG keys in-repo instead of fetching them from `centos_epel_key` url.
With this patch we unify approach with other roles and reducing
maintenance costs of the repo when adding new distributions
Reviewed: https:/ /review. opendev. org/c/openstack /openstack- ansible- ceph_client/ +/879084 /opendev. org/openstack/ openstack- ansible- ceph_client/ commit/ 7a70556e151f9b5 28732ff24fd8fca 0de18fd97b
Committed: https:/
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: master
commit 7a70556e151f9b5 28732ff24fd8fca 0de18fd97b
Author: Dmitriy Rabotyagov <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Mar 30 21:16:28 2023 +0200
Unify EPEL gpg key and repo provisioning
At the moment we do install EPEL repo in multiple other roles, like
lxc_hosts or systemd_mount. We're trying to be consistent in ways
of adding them, while ceph_client was slightly different, by carrying on
GPG keys in-repo instead of fetching them from `centos_epel_key` url.
With this patch we unify approach with other roles and reducing
maintenance costs of the repo when adding new distributions
Change-Id: I407256dc6eee33 65c4f8c191a1f50 717f0b35fa8
Related-Bug: #2013276