Comment 5 for bug 2006986
Revision history for this message
| Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) wrote | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Also providing output from failures is important, as I'm not really sure what is actually going wrong and thus it would be hard to reproduce.
As eventually, haproxy should bind normally on FQDN given that you don't use DNS RR for the VIP.