(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > What about to read again article ? Take care on subtitle.
> >
> > But then your article is a bit restrictive: one also wants to pass
> > locales with non-login shells (e.g., if a command is given to ssh).
>
> "non-login" shells works for me.
Upstream bash doesn't with ssh -t: this is a well-known bug^Wfeature.
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > What about to read again article ? Take care on subtitle.
> >
> > But then your article is a bit restrictive: one also wants to pass
> > locales with non-login shells (e.g., if a command is given to ssh).
>
> "non-login" shells works for me.
Upstream bash doesn't with ssh -t: this is a well-known bug^Wfeature.