On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jason Stephenson <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
>
> I actually think that the inclusion of malloc.h can be removed from
> Linux, too. I've never needed to include it, unless I'm doing something
> implementation-specific that one shouldn't do in the first place.
>
Agreed. I guess I though the malloc_stats() stuff needed it, but that
doesn't appear to be the case.
-b
--
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: <email address hidden>
| web: http://esilibrary.com
| Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jason Stephenson <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> specific that one shouldn't do in the first place.
> I actually think that the inclusion of malloc.h can be removed from
> Linux, too. I've never needed to include it, unless I'm doing something
> implementation-
>
Agreed. I guess I though the malloc_stats() stuff needed it, but that
doesn't appear to be the case.
-b
-- esilibrary. com
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: <email address hidden>
| web: http://
| Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source