Comment 15 for bug 500119

Revision history for this message
GMaq (info-bandshed) wrote :

Bummer!... but understandable for the time being. Thanks for looking into it, I'm sure almost nonexistent demands for JACK support in the recent survey takes it down several notches on the todo list as well. I do reiterate that many users are likely unaware of what JACK plugin support and transport could accomplish especially for restoration work but that's an issue for another time.

Looking forward to 1.2.0, great work so far!!