On 03/15/2012 12:05 AM, Vitor Silva wrote:
> Both structures look good to me.
Thanks for the feedback Vitor!
> Would it be possible to add that attribute that specifies the type of
> function being used in the continuous fragility functions? this would
> be specified only once, since it would be common to all of the
> functions.
Of course! I forgot to add that to the continuous example..
Where should the "type" attribute sit? On the "ffs" tag?
On 03/15/2012 12:05 AM, Vitor Silva wrote:
> Both structures look good to me.
Thanks for the feedback Vitor!
> Would it be possible to add that attribute that specifies the type of
> function being used in the continuous fragility functions? this would
> be specified only once, since it would be common to all of the
> functions.
Of course! I forgot to add that to the continuous example..
Where should the "type" attribute sit? On the "ffs" tag?