Comment 7 for bug 520006

Hello All,

@Numérigraphe:

Yes using openobject just as lib doesn't seems to be the way to use it
at first time but it's not exactly. The point is to be able to deploy
and maintain an installation using "normal" python tools like
virtualenv, zc.buildout, pip, supervisor, paster...

1. I'm from the Zope and Pylons world and for me it's very unlikely to
came the day I'll deploy a service with apt-get or something like
that.

2. The other point is to have a project correctly splited in modules,
modularisation is the way to go if we want to attract new developpers
and to ensure to have something rock solide.

@Stephane (Open ERP):

Very great work ! I was starting to move the code of openobject
exactly the same way as you did, yesterday. Was is the status of your
work ? Is there some bug related to the new organisation ? Is there
something I can do to help ?

Oh and by the way, the encrypted message was for me or it was a
mistake, cause I don't find a key to decrypt it...

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Stephane (Open ERP) <email address hidden> wrote:
> Currently, I have splitted the server from OpenObject.
>
> In the new bin directory of my branch,  you will find two examples.
>
> 1. bin/openerp-server
> This script uses the server component of OpenObject
>
> 2. bin/fetch_user
> This script is just an example, it shows how to use the library without to start the server.
>
> But this branch is in development, I will provide each week a new
> revision with a merge of the current trunk and the improvements of my
> refactoring.
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> Incorrect organisation of the code
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520006
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>